Every dismissal in South Africa must be fair twice over: a valid reason (substantive fairness) and a proper process (procedural fairness). Get either wrong and the CCMA can order reinstatement with full back pay, or compensation of up to 12 months' pay for a standard unfair dismissal and up to 24 months for an automatically unfair one. The worker has 30 calendar days from dismissal to refer the dispute, so a sloppy dismissal lands on your desk fast.
The three fair grounds
The Labour Relations Act (LRA, sections 185 to 195) recognises only three fair reasons to dismiss:
- Misconduct: a serious, proven breach such as theft, assault, gross insubordination or gross negligence.
- Incapacity: poor performance or ill health, after a fair support process.
- Operational requirements: retrenchment for genuine business reasons under section 189.
"He irritated me", "she asked for a raise" and "the client did not pay me" are not on the list.
Misconduct: running a fair hearing
Substantive fairness means the misconduct actually happened, is serious enough, and dismissal is a proportionate response. Procedural fairness means a real hearing:
- Give written notice of the allegation with enough time to prepare; 48 hours is the working minimum.
- Hold a disciplinary hearing with a chairperson who is not the complainant.
- Let the worker state their case, call witnesses and question yours.
- Allow representation by a fellow employee or union representative.
- Give a written decision with reasons.
- Apply progressive discipline: warnings before dismissal unless the misconduct destroys the trust relationship outright.
A small builder does not need an HR department for this; a notebook, a calm hearing in the site office and a written outcome will do. What sinks employers at the CCMA is dismissing on the spot in a temper.
Incapacity: performance and ill health
For poor performance: counsel the worker, set clear and measurable targets, provide support and a reasonable time to improve, and only then hold an incapacity enquiry. For ill health: investigate the prognosis and look hard at reasonable accommodation (lighter duties, adjusted hours) before an incapacity hearing. A worker off injured on a COIDA claim is a medical incapacity process, not a disappearing act you can fire over; see COIDA injury claims.
Retrenchment (section 189)
For smaller employers (fewer than 10 dismissals), the process is:
- A written notice inviting consultation, setting out the reasons, the number of jobs affected, the proposed selection criteria and the severance proposal.
- Genuine consultation with the affected workers or their representatives, considering alternatives such as short time, reduced pay or natural attrition.
- Written or oral representations, each answered in writing.
- Selection on fair, agreed criteria; last-in-first-out is common but not compulsory.
- Severance pay of at least 1 week's pay per completed year of service (BCEA section 41), plus notice pay and accrued leave.
Retrenchments of 10 or more in a 12-month period trigger the stricter section 189A process with CCMA facilitation. Retrenched workers claim UIF: point them to UIF claims.
The CCMA process: con-arb
A dismissed worker refers an unfair dismissal dispute to the CCMA on LRA Form 7.11 within 30 calendar days of the dismissal or the internal appeal outcome (www.ccma.org.za, 0861 161616). The CCMA runs most dismissal disputes as con-arb, meaning conciliation and arbitration on the same day:
- Conciliation: a commissioner tries to broker a settlement; no evidence is led and the discussion is confidential.
- Arbitration: if conciliation fails, arbitration can follow immediately. Both sides lead evidence and the commissioner issues a binding award. A party can object in writing at least 7 days before the hearing to split the two stages where the rules allow.
Retrenchment disputes do not follow con-arb; they go to arbitration or the Labour Court depending on the case. Awards are enforceable, and ignoring one turns a labour problem into a sheriff-at-the-door problem.
Worked example: dismissal for theft
Maria is caught on CCTV stealing tools. Her employer gives her written notice of a disciplinary hearing 48 hours ahead, stating the allegation. At the hearing she denies it; the footage is shown; she questions the witnesses. The chairperson finds her guilty and dismisses her, given the seriousness, and issues a written outcome. Maria refers the dispute to the CCMA within 30 days. Conciliation fails, arbitration follows the same day, and the commissioner finds the dismissal substantively and procedurally fair. The employer wins because the process was clean, not because the theft was obvious.
Common mistakes
- Firing on the spot. Even for serious misconduct, skipping the hearing usually makes the dismissal procedurally unfair.
- No written anything. No notice, no outcome letter, no notes equals no evidence at arbitration.
- Dressing up retrenchment as misconduct (or vice versa). Each ground has its own process; mixing them fails both.
- Missing the worker's 30-day window from the other side: treat any CCMA notice seriously and show up. Awards in your absence are real.
- Paying severance short. One week per completed year is the floor, before notice pay and leave.
Know someone who needs this?
Keep reading
Was this guide useful?
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Spotted something wrong or out of date? Email us at hello@kilnguides.co.uk.
In crisis? SADAG 0800 567 567 ·